You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What do you think makes sense for the location of the extract script? I would argue that currently not placing it anywhere in package or providing it after downloading a file from geofabrik doesn't make sense because then you have to figure out where it got downloaded to. It might make more sense to either:
A. Include it in a newly created directory after the user runs download with geofabrik
B. Communicate to the user where the script can be found either locally (if we choose to automatically download it) or online (if we don't) after they run download with geofabrik
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah that's cool with me. I think prclz extract makes sense, that way we're giving them a Python wrapper for something that's currently an external shell script. We will need an equivalent Windows version, but I'm not sure I'm proficient enough at batch to be the one to do it. I'll look into it though.
What do you think makes sense for the location of the extract script? I would argue that currently not placing it anywhere in package or providing it after downloading a file from geofabrik doesn't make sense because then you have to figure out where it got downloaded to. It might make more sense to either:
A. Include it in a newly created directory after the user runs download with geofabrik
B. Communicate to the user where the script can be found either locally (if we choose to automatically download it) or online (if we don't) after they run download with geofabrik
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: