Skip to content

optional should provide operator-> #63

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
jfirebaugh opened this issue Jan 15, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

optional should provide operator-> #63

jfirebaugh opened this issue Jan 15, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@jfirebaugh
Copy link
Contributor

I frequently want to do if (optional) optional->method() and have to use if (optional) (*optional).method() instead.

@joto
Copy link
Contributor

joto commented Jan 22, 2016

Optional is deprecated. See #64.

@joto joto closed this as completed Jan 22, 2016
@springmeyer springmeyer added this to the 1.1.0 milestone Feb 10, 2016
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants