You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Was playing around with budo-less and had the idea that budo could support any arbitrary middleware that followed a particular pattern (maybe like simple-less-middlewares), and would map that to a cli switch when budo is invoked.
I imagine budo doesn't want to get bogged down with heavy, convoluted configuration (see: webpack compared to browserify itself), but I could also see a usecase for two to three middlewares being all that's necessary to have a full-fledged dev server running within minutes without a ton of task runner or watcher configuration (see: gulp), etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
👍 Definitely worth exploring. A plugin architecture would be cleaner than having budo-less, budo-sass, budo-styl, etc. It would just be aimed at common use cases.
Still, it's a bit of a balancing act, trying to avoid budo becoming a "framework" or monolithic Gulp/Grunt alternative.
But it could also be used to configure budo itself, for example adding a new middleware with --preset=sass, using a different defaultIndex stream, etc.
Was playing around with budo-less and had the idea that budo could support any arbitrary middleware that followed a particular pattern (maybe like
simple-less-middleware
s), and would map that to a cli switch when budo is invoked.I imagine budo doesn't want to get bogged down with heavy, convoluted configuration (see: webpack compared to browserify itself), but I could also see a usecase for two to three middlewares being all that's necessary to have a full-fledged dev server running within minutes without a ton of task runner or watcher configuration (see: gulp), etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: