-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
FUNCT equivalent for closure!s #2001
Comments
Submitted by: Ladislav Since the need was urgent, we decided (for the purpose of R3GUI) to use FUNCT/CLOSURE. (It is not at many places at present) |
Submitted by: Ladislav Pull request created. |
Submitted by: fork I suggest that going with the spirit of CC#1973, two pairs be made: CLOSURE and FUNCTION CLOS and FUNC Like "func", the made-up word "clos" could indicate a more fundamental building block of the nicer-named variations, which do not give the appearance of "everything in Rebol is global by default". |
Submitted by: BrianH As simple as the /closure option is to add, I agree with Fork here. We should go with #1973 on this. And noone is going to port the Common Lisp Object System to Rebol, so we won't have a naming conflict. |
Submitted by: Ladislav Well, I do not intend to discuss the CLOS and CLOSURE naming issues here. In my opinion, renaming may be controversial and subject to Carl's decision (CLOSURE naming change would most probably create more compatibility issues than FUNCTION naming change). So, please, resolve that as a separate ticket/issue allowing: * Carl to decide whether to accept it
* Cyphre and me to work on R3GUI now |
Submitted by: BrianH #1973 and #2002 implemented instead of this one. |
Submitted by: cyphre2
Would be nice to have equivalent mezzanine to FUNCT but for making closure!s as well.
It could be either just a /closure refinement for FUNCT or completely new mezz. What do you think?
CC - Data [ Version: r3 master Type: Wish Platform: All Category: Mezzanine Reproduce: Always Fixed-in:none ]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: