Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Inaccurate documentation copy? #167

Closed
leehambley opened this issue Feb 15, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Inaccurate documentation copy? #167

leehambley opened this issue Feb 15, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@leehambley
Copy link

Compare this to the likes of Vlad or Capistrano, where each command is ran separately on their own SSH sessions. Mina only creates one SSH session per deploy, minimizing the SSH connection overhead.

I don't know if docs are stored here, but Capistrano has had for a number of months a connection pool which shaves about 70% of the deploy time off most of our scripts here.

It might be worth editing this copy to reflect the inaccuracy rather than throwing another FOSS project under the bus.

No worries either way, feel free to close the issue. I had a similar discussion with the Vlad team a number of years ago where they were claiming something "sucked less than Capistrano".

We're all in it together as they say!

@mislav
Copy link

mislav commented May 20, 2014

Just wanted to open this issue as well. Please do not provide inaccurate information about alternative libraries.

@defeated
Copy link

FWIW I believe this still applies to Capistrano 2.x (which was the current version of cap when these docs were written)

Looks like the docs are in the following repo -
https://github.com/mina-deploy/mina-docs/blob/master/source/index.md

@d4be4st
Copy link
Member

d4be4st commented Jul 5, 2015

would love a PR for this as we stoped using Capistrano long ago and do not know the changes :(

@d4be4st d4be4st closed this as completed Jul 8, 2016
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants