-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
setting completely correlated interventions does not result in the expected coverage #307
Comments
Could this be caused by mortality? An individual's state gets reset when they die (in the
That final output excludes any individuals that died at step 2. Actually net might have been a bad example here since I later realised it gets reset when the net is thrown away rather than at death. The general idea still applies though. |
Digging around a bit more, a few more factors that may be relevant:
As far as I can tell the actual simulation behaviour and correlation works, it is the reporting that is a inconsistent and/or ambiguous. |
Thanks very much for the input, Paul! You make some very good points 😄 I'll have to reconfigure the combined output variables and the time window in which they are calculated. |
When setting the inter_round_rho to 1 between two interventions, the model does not assign the same individuals to get interventions. For example, with 50% ITNs across the whole population and 50% SMC among children and perfect correlation, I would expect all of those children receiving SMC to also get a bednet. But the level is <100%, the model seems to prioritize more nets to the children with SMC, but not at the level set by the correlation.
This test-case uses the feat/correlation_outputs branch, which has added in model output variables for the number of individuals receiving combined interventions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: