Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[Imagery View] View large has a delay for image sizing #5053

Closed
1 of 5 tasks
jvigliotta opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5054
Closed
1 of 5 tasks

[Imagery View] View large has a delay for image sizing #5053

jvigliotta opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5054

Comments

@jvigliotta
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

If you choose to "view large" on an imagery item in a display or flexible layout, there's a 400ms delay for the image to resize to fit the new large container.

Expected vs Current Behavior

Should not have a delay.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Select the "View large" option for imagery in a display or flexible layout
  2. Notice there is a delay before the image is enlarged to fit the larger container

Impact Check List

  • Data loss or misrepresented data?
  • Regression? Did this used to work or has it always been broken?
  • Is there a workaround available?
  • Does this impact a critical component?
  • Is this just a visual bug with no functional impact?

Additional Information

@jvigliotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Testing

  • view large an imagery view in a display or flexible layout
  • note that there is no delay for the image to be enlargenated (yes... that's not a word, but it should be no?).

@jvigliotta jvigliotta changed the title [Imager View] View large has a delay for image sizing [Imagery View] View large has a delay for image sizing Apr 11, 2022
@shefalijoshi
Copy link
Contributor

Verified fixed

@akhenry
Copy link
Contributor

akhenry commented Apr 25, 2022

Verified fixed.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants