-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Add MANC symmetric surface #11
Comments
neuropil or tissue? We don't really have a good combined neuropil right now (just the one with many individual neuropil domains). For the time being you can do
as per https://flyconnectome.github.io/malevnc/reference/mirror_manc.html#examples which I'm sure you've seen |
@dokato simplified the all-tissue mesh and that could be symmetrised. |
I meant just the tissue. |
Sure, see #15 |
@mmc46 Were you think these
and get them? |
Yes, something like that.
… On 13 Jun 2021, at 18:26, Gregory Jefferis ***@***.***> wrote:
@mmc46 Were you think these all-tissue masks would be called MANC.surf and MANCsym.surf, respectively, so that one could do:
plot3d(MANC)
plot3d(MANCsym)
and get them?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
@dokato I think it would be good if you would update the names of the two surfaces to |
What happens then with:
? IMHO the naming was good, as it indicated that this is a tissue surface. |
|
Indeed, I should have saved it with parameter to support backward compatibility, however, even quicker fix might be bumping up the minimum R version to 3.5, since even that is quite old as for now. I'm about to fix naming anyway here, once @jefferis decides what to do with old MANC.surf object. |
Is it possible to add a surface for the
MANCsym
template brain object?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: