Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 3, 2021. It is now read-only.

Ordering by temporal type #162

Closed
johnymontana opened this issue Dec 21, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Ordering by temporal type #162

johnymontana opened this issue Dec 21, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@johnymontana
Copy link
Contributor

Temporal fields are not added to the ordering enum

# for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? #.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant