-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
Specify Order By #47
Comments
Any progress on this? |
@johnymontana is any help needed or @zacksayenko is there any workaround we can use for now? Its really important for me as I'm in the middle of a product launch :) |
@appinteractive have you tried the
|
Yeah @johnymontana but I always get the default order. Im ordering the results by creation date which I saved as string. Could this be the problem? Do I have to do any atitional stuff on the database level? Here the query that was run:
I'm trying to avoid timestamps as no one can read them By the way - this is my relation on the User type: |
@appinteractive after looking into this I realized we've only implemented ordering at the top level operation and not nested selections. This is a bug as the |
@johnymontana thanks! Can you specifiy "soon" a bit more? Just want to know as we depend on that feature in our project. |
@appinteractive we've prioritized it for the current sprint. I'll work on moving all issues into a Github project board so we have better visibility of the roadmap and current progress |
@appinteractive any progress on this? |
@johnymontana Can you give us any progress update on the nested orderBy? |
@johnymontana yeah any progress? Happy New Year by the way :) 🎉🥳 |
@johnymontana. Its been about a month since the last chase up .... any progress re a fix to this issue? |
The fix for nested ordering should be dropping this week - sorry for the delay on this. |
The fix for this is now available in v2.3.0 - please test and let us know how it works. |
The problem is still there. We've nested items :
Whetever field we define for orderBy to order our comments, it doesn't change the order. We've version neo4j-graphql-js 2.11.0 Any idea why? |
Is there a way to specify Order By for arrays of nodes?
I see the current generated cypher queries do not have Order By specified and it just returns the list of nodes in a default order, is there a way to change it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: