Creative Development Points | APCSP

[utterances-bot]

Creative Development Points | APCSP

Don’t do it alone. 4 person grading.

[syeung2]

Comment here to start review ticket. From Creative Development Points blog click time stamp to get back to GitHub Issue.

[JakeWarren2414]

Period 4
Jake's Review Ticket: 3.0
Finn's Review Ticket: 3.0

[bushku]

Shruthi's Review Ticket

[emmaxshen]

Emma's Review Ticket
Vivian's Review Ticket
Amay's Review Ticket
Sarah's Review Ticket

[A1234l]

Alan's Review Ticket

[Emaad-Mir]

Period 4 Mortensen:

Person	Grade	Review Ticket
Emaad Mir	2.7+	Emaad Mir's Review Ticket
Edwin Abraham	2.7+	Edwin Abraham's Review Ticket
Luka Van Den Boomen	2.7+	Luka Van Den Booman's Review Ticket
Jishnu Singiresu	2.7+	Jishnu Singiresu's Review Ticket

[clairehzhao]

Period 4 APCSP

Name	/3.0	Review Ticket Link
Tanisha	2.7+	tanishapatil1234/test-fastpage-tp#6
Claire	2.7+	clairehzhao/claire#6
Amitha	TBD	TBD
Grace	2.7+	(gwang1224/repository_1#6 (comment))

[Azeem-Khan1]

Period 4 Yeung

Team member	Grade	Review Ticket Link
Varalu N.	2.7+	Review Ticket
Azeem Khan	2.7+	Review Ticket
Colin Mills	2.7	Review Ticket
Chinmay R.	2.7	Review Ticket

[Ryanrob327]

Ryan M.
Josh W.
Chris
Eli G.

[sophia926]

Period 4 Mr. Yeung

Name	Grade	Review Ticket Link
Sophia Tang	2.7+	Link
Hae Ryn Yu	2.7+	Link
Annika Liao	2.7+	Link
Liav Bar	2.7+	Link

[vardaansinha]

Group Review Ticket

Member	Crossover Grader	Peer Graded Score	Reason for Score	Review Ticket
Akshat Parikh	Samit Poojary	2.7+	Nice job Akshat! Great job with the AppLab project as well as the outlining for it. His brainstorming is easy to navigate, and is extremely fluid. His quiz is fully functional and exceptionally unique. I grade Akshat to a 2.7+ for sure!	https://github.com/akshat122805/fastpages/issues/6
David Vasilev	Vardaan Sinha	3	You did a very good job with your quiz. I also like how you are continuing to go above and beyond with the CSS changes on your FastPages site, which is why I gave you a 3/3.	https://github.com/DavidVasilev1/fastpages/issues/7
Samit Poojary	David Vasilev	2.7+	Samit did a very good job of completing the task that was given and then going above and beyond by creating a second quiz. Both quizzes have a simple interface that is easy to follow and act upon, based on what input the program requires. One program is based on soccer, which is both educational and fun, while the other is based on stress relief, which is educational and also very useful. His blogs about the quiz and about his brainstorm for the Performance Task are very clear and informational. They complete all of the requirements that we were presented with.	https://github.com/SamitPoojary/FASTPAGES/issues/6
Vardaan Sinha	Akshat Parikh	2.8	I give you a solid 2.8, your quiz has a good source of functionality and does what it needs to. Your quiz is visually appealing and it also very interactive. I also give you a 2.8 because you coherently documented the process for the development of your quiz, so good job on that.	https://github.com/vardaansinha/FastPages/issues/6

[keiraokimoto]

Name	Peer Graded Score	Link
Keira O.	2.8	Link
Ellie P.	2.8	Link
Giannina O.	TBD	Link
Jeffrey F.	TBD	Link
Khalid F.	TBD	Link

[lunaiwa]

Person	Grade	Review-Ticket
Ethan	TBD	TBD
Rohin	TBD	TBD
Parav	TBD	TBD
Luna(me)	TBD	lunaiwa/iwazaki/issues/5
Taiyo	TBD	TBD

[RohanAgr]

Name	Grade	Reason For Grade	Review Ticket Link
Rohan	2.7+	All the requirements were met, and there was creativity in the app.	Link
Saavan	2.7+	All requirements were met, and the app and blog posts were well thought out.	Link
Derek	2.7+	All the requirements were met and his posts had extensive information about his projects and ideas.	Link
Dillon	2.7+	All the requirements were met, and he had an extensive blog post about AppLab.	Link

[Krishiv111]

Period 5 APCSP

Member	Score	Review Ticket
Krishiv	2.7+	Krishiv111/liverpoolkm#4
Shivansh	2.7+	DeadshotLegend/Shivansh-Goel-Fast-Pages#5
Druhva	2.7+	BuddaBaker/Fastpages#3
Prasith	2.7+	BuddaBaker/Fastpages#3
Advay	2.7+	ADVAYS16/CSP-#2 (comment)

[lwu1822]

Name	Review Ticket
Lily	Review Ticket
Shreyas	Review Ticket
Ekam	Review Ticket
Ishi	Review Ticket

(Crossover grade on review ticket)

[STG-7]

Period 4 Mr. Mortensen:

Member	Score	Review Ticket
Shaurya Goel	2.7+	Shaurya's Review Ticket
Trey Blalock	2.7	Trey's Review Ticket
Kaylee Hou	2.7+	Kaylee's Review Ticket
Benjamin Lee	2.7	Ben's Review Ticket
Nicolas Mosqueda	2.7	Nicolas's Review Ticket

[RyanHaki]

Period 5 Yeung

Member	Score	Review Ticket
Ryan .H	2.7+	Link
Soham .K	2.7+	Link
Aniket .C	2.7+	Link
Lucas .M	2.7+	Link

[safinsingh]

Period 4

Safin: safinsingh/fastpages-apcsp#10
Alex: AlexKumar19/fastpages-APCSP#8

Navan: NavanYatavelli/fastpages#6
Kalani: kalanicabralomana/Fastpages#6

[shruthim0]

Period 4, Mr. Yeung

Shruthi: Review Ticket
self-grade: 2.7. I included images, buttons, and user prompts and had an additional element, which prompted the user for their name, stored it as a variable, and then later their name was called on when presenting the score calculation.
peer grade and comments: 2.7 The quiz was really organized and took input of the person's name. It told you when you got an answer right or not and you were able to calculate your score afterward. There were many ideas for the performance task and the outline plan of the quiz looked very thought out.

Jocelyn: Review Ticket
self-grade: 2.7+ I had a lot of elements used on my quiz. I had a button to click the answer, a dropdown, and a checkbox. I also calculated the score on the go and at the end. I also had an intro with unlocking the phone and navigating to the chrome browser to open the quiz. I also added some background noises and speech.
peer grade and comments: 2.7+ - Performance Task brainstorming was thorough. The quiz was unique could tell lots of work went into it. Score calculation is included. Additionally, the user is prompted to enter their name and the input is stored as a variable and later called on.

Justin: Review Ticket
self-grade: 2.7+
peer grade:

Jeongwoo: Review Ticket
self-grade:
peer grade:

[sreejagangapuram]

Group Member	Review Ticket	Grade	Comments
Sreeja	Review Ticket	2.7+	Had everything done. Made a quiz that has audio and points. Blogged plans for the quiz and included the edits made along the way. Also made a blog with two game ideas.
Aliya	Review Ticket	2.7+	Completed the basic app lab, app lab plan and reflection, and the create task outline. Went above and beyond on quiz. Added several different details, such as: easy and hard mode, multiple choice option, and text input option.
Claire	Review Ticket	2.7+	Added extra question, speech, and hard and easy mode in quiz.
Ananya	Review Ticket	2.7+	Added extra features to quiz and did more than what was expected. Added two modes the player could choose from, added changing the song as they answered the question, and for hard mode let them type the lyrics.

[avac54765]

Ava Carlson's Review Ticket
Alexa Carlson's Review Ticket
Shruthi Damodar's Review Ticket
Antony Yu's Review Ticket

[Toby-Leeder]

Name	Grade	Link
Toby Leeder	TBD	Link
Caleb Navarro	2.7	Link
Nathan Capule	2.7+	Link
Gene Chang	2.7+	Link

[nsk1207]

Nathan's Review Ticket
Max's Review Ticket
Sri's Review Ticket
Alyssa

[rey444]

Week 3 Review Ticket - Shreya Sapkal
Week 3 Review Ticket - Jiya Savlani
Week 3 Review Ticket - Noor Grewal
Week 3 Review Ticket - Sanika Shahapurkar

[kaiden-dough]

Group Review Tickets:

• Kaiden Do: Ticket
• Theodore Huntalas: Ticket
• Mani Taleban: Ticket
• Kush Sirohi: Ticket

[TheGerbil21]

Mr. Mortensen's Period 3 Class

Group Member	Review Ticket	Grade	Comments (Peer Grading)
Jeffrey Lee	Review Ticket	2.7	Had great planning and well-structured code. While the AppLab project was a bit short in terms of code functions, the entire process runs smoothly and doesn't have any other extra features like sounds and score counting. Documented his successes and failures well.
James Armstrong	Review Ticket	2.7	James has a very good quiz that has Easy, Medium, and Hard modes. His blog is very detailed on what his idea was and for that, I think he deserves a 2.7. His quiz was very detailed and it was balanced between all the modes scaling from easiest to hardest.
Ethan Truong	Review Ticket	2.7	Ethan has a very good quiz with 2 modes easy mode and hard mode. His blog is very detailed and shows that his quiz was pre-planned. I think he deserves a 2.7 because he did everything detailed in the project and it was very effective.
Luke Riggins	Review Ticket	2.7+	Has a good planning document and has an extensively developed AppLab quiz, complete with selectable difficulty, music and sound effects, and use of the timer to make screen transitions. It is clear that he worked hard on the project and made a successful quiz.

[drewreed2005]

Name	Review Ticket	Grade	Explanation
Drew Reed	Post	2.7+	AppLab quiz brainstorming in post, finished quiz with score function, link to fastpages, "How I Got a 5!" multiple choice quiz with recursive loop (Hack + review)
Devon Shepherd	Post	1.7	Unfinished quiz, no planning document, no Hacks
Trent Cardall	Issue	2.7	Finished quiz, quiz planning document, no scoring (but redo for wrong answers), link to fastpages
Jagger Klein	Issue	2.7	Quiz planning document, finished AppLab quiz with many options for different types of inputs, no scoring (but redo for wrong answers)

[TayKimmy]

Person	Grade	Review Ticket Link
Tay	2.7+	Tay's review ticket
Aditya	2.7+	Aditya's review ticket
Arnav	2.7+	Arnav's review ticket
Luke	2.7	Luke's review ticket

[YLu-1258]

Member Name	Crossover Grader	Grade	Review Ticket Link	Reasoning
Alex Lu	Evan Aparri	2.7 +	Ticket	Great Job Alex on your AppLab. You created two different types of questions, a MC one and a user inputted one. You were able to manage where buttons would take you to different screens depending on the question you just did while using only one screen (reduced the amount of correct or incorrect answers screens you needed to create). You created a string concatenation that told the user how many incorrect attempts they took during the quiz.
Evan Aparri	Alex Lu	2.7 +	Ticket	Evan had a really well designed Quiz that highlighted many features that applab presented. What I liked in particular about his quiz was the level selection dropdown menu that he provided, granting a greater functionality towards a larger demographic of users. Something else that caught my eye was how he differed himself from the original quiz, in that he used a free response answer prompt to receive user inputs, which required additional thought behind the implementation. Furthermore, his plan for the creative development project was also well done along with his scrumboard.
Mirza Hasseb Beg	Tirth Thakkar	2.7+	Ticket	2.7+ Through creating a detailed quiz that had free response questions instead of multiple choice to increase the challenge in creating a quiz that has such features, along with the questions having a score that changed correctly with questions answered. Along with creating a very detailed college board brainstorm with ambitious ideas such as linking with other applications such as Spotify, and wanting to create applications such as a calculator that can perform semi-complex math operations.
Tirth Thakkar	Mirza Hasseb Beg	2.7+	Ticket	Tirth gets a 2.7+ from me because he did everything listed and he went above and beyond in some areas. For his quiz, it is scalable, meaning that there can be multiple quizzes that can be accessed through the home page. He added text questions, and the quiz looks very pleasing to the eye. His write up was very descriptive and it is easy to follow.

[Martynguyen64]

Johnathans Ticket
Abdullahs Ticket
Martins Ticket
Leonard is absent, however he most likely has his ticket up and running

[A1234l]

Person	Grade	Review Tickets
Alan	2.7+	Alan's Review Ticket
Steven	2.7+	Steven's Review Ticket
Noor	2.7+	Noor's Review Ticket
Ederick	2.7+	Ederick's Review Ticket

[ahadb63]

Person	Grade	Review Tickets
Ahad	2.7+	Ahads's Review Ticket
Sabine	2.7+	Sabine's Review
Dash	2.7+	Dash's Review Ticket
Aiden	2.7+	Aiden's Review Ticket

[Orlando-c]

Table Group Review Tickets

Names	Tickets	Grades	Class
Orlando C	Review Ticket	3.0	Yeung Per. 5
Colin W	Review Ticket	3.0	Yeung Per. 5
Jaden N	Review Ticket	3.0	Yeung Per. 5
Ethan Z	Review Ticket	2.7+	Yeung Per. 5

[lydia-c2]

Lydia C - REVIEW TICKET - 2.7+
Naja F - REVIEW TICKET - 2.7+
Lina A - REVIEW TICKET - 2.7+
Dylan G - REVIEW TICKET - 2.7

[sachitcode]

Group Member	Review Ticket	Score
Harsha	Review Ticket	2.7+
Yuri	Review Ticket	2.7+
Tanay	Review Ticket	2.7+
Sachit	Review Ticket	2.7+
Raunak	Review Ticket	2.7+