Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

ChainyJS - microjs task runner #26

Open
balupton opened this issue Mar 20, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

ChainyJS - microjs task runner #26

balupton opened this issue Mar 20, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@balupton
Copy link

Taking a bunch of ideas here, I created https://github.com/chainyjs/chainy about a year ago. I then took a big break of programming. While I think it isn't there yet, it certainly has potential. I'm keen to garner more widespread feedback from people in this area.

@balupton
Copy link
Author

... no thoughts at all?

@tunnckoCore
Copy link

yo man, yea it's in my todo list from few days. :)

@tkellen
Copy link
Contributor

tkellen commented Apr 22, 2015

@balupton To be totally honest, I'm burnt out on task runner theory. I'm quite happy to maintain foundational modules that make them easier to write (liftoff, etc) but I don't have the energy or interest in trying to rally the community around a standard these days.

/cc @contra @phated

@yocontra
Copy link

What does it provide that streams don't, other than a better API?

@balupton
Copy link
Author

@contra it doesn't depend on streams, so can work with any data type - arrays, buffers, objects, whatnot. More complicated example is here: http://runnable.com/U6ichlSIeJ8quen5/create-a-geojson-file-for-your-github-communities-for-node-js-and-chainyjs

@yocontra
Copy link

@balupton objectMode streams can also pass any kind of data around, which is what gulpjs uses. for an abstraction over streams that provides a similar API to chainy you can check out http://highlandjs.org/

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants