Skip to content

LTS Meeting March 13 - 5 EST #185

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
mhdawson opened this issue Mar 13, 2017 · 10 comments
Closed

LTS Meeting March 13 - 5 EST #185

mhdawson opened this issue Mar 13, 2017 · 10 comments

Comments

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Mar 13, 2017

Present

@nodejs/lts

When

9PM Monday March 13 UTC, or in your local timezone:
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Node.js+LTS+Working+Group+Meeting&iso=20170313T17&p1=179&ah=1

Where

Hangouts on Air:

Agenda

nodejs/LTS

other

  • Backporting WG #184

Minutes

Should we consider swapping the timeframe for Active LTS and Maitanance lts-agenda [#130 ] (#130)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qaloPiXAZd5Pf3H0CtzW7m5kk-ahOKZg622KXAr8ehE/edit

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for taking the lead @mhdawson I've been pretty buried and really appreciate the help

@gibfahn
Copy link
Member

gibfahn commented Mar 13, 2017

I'd like to join this meeting if possible (not sure what the rules are for joining).

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@MylesBorins I saw a comment on another issue about you being out today ? Are you going to be able to make it. I've set the time/date to match what is in the community google calendar.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@gibfahn, I'd say just join, I don't think there will be any objections.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

I'll plan to post the PR for the minutes in the next day or so.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

PR for minutes: #187

@binoculars
Copy link

LTS Codename?

Logical choices seem to be a C from the periodic table, which comes down to:

  • Cadmium
  • Calcium
  • Californium
  • Carbon
  • Cerium
  • Cesium
  • Chlorine
  • Chromium
  • Cobalt
  • Copper
  • Curium

Carbon seems like the best fit, with a low atomic number, and ends in -on like the 2 other codenames. Chromium, would be too confusing.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

@binoculars codename is being discussed here: #163

@gibfahn
Copy link
Member

gibfahn commented Apr 20, 2017

Minutes landed, closing...

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants