diff --git a/wg-meetings/2023-06-27.md b/wg-meetings/2023-06-27.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0c8abf6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wg-meetings/2023-06-27.md
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# Node.js  Diagnostics WorkGroup Meeting 2023-06-27
+
+## Links
+
+* **Recording**:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPKPYqqtAGk
+* **GitHub Issue**: https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/615
+* **Minutes Google Doc**: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZWUrpBDQosDGNUrweexZ4WGBJawxkWbRWcTKG-9UqBQ/edit
+
+## Present
+
+* Diagnostics team: @nodejs/diagnostics
+
+Gabriel Bota (@dygabo)
+Gireesh Punathil (@gireeshpunathil )
+Stephen Belanger (@qard)
+Chengzhong Wu (@legendecas)
+
+## Agenda
+
+## Announcements
+
+*Extracted from **diag-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting.
+
+### nodejs/node
+
+* lib: rewrite AsyncLocalStorage without async_hooks [#48528](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/48528)
+ * started working on the model
+ * does not require async_hooks in anyway
+ * reviews welcome
+
+### nodejs/diagnostics
+
+* Issue for Diagnostics project related news ? [#614](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/614)
+ * Will wait for Michael
+
+* TC39 proposal AsyncContext [#608](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/608)
+ * talked to the TC39 committee, no objections to using call the reject's call time context for unhandledRejection: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-context/issues/16#issuecomment-1531941423
+* agreed on having generators record the context at the initialization time, and having every .next() just restore the initialization time's context: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-context/issues/18#issuecomment-1531935431
+
+
+
+## Q&A, Other
+
+## Upcoming Meetings
+
+* **Node.js Project Calendar**: <https://nodejs.org/calendar>
+
+Click `+GoogleCalendar` at the bottom right to add to your own Google calendar.