-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Improve SecurityWG Scorecard #884
Comments
I would like to work on this issue |
@shubham-y feel free to pick one item from the list and make the PR. |
Hi All, I am the founder of StepSecurity. We are developing a few tools like app.stepsecurity.io to simplify developers' work and increase the OpenSSF Scorecard score using automation. Please let me know if I can help in any way. I am curious if this issue is only for this repo or to increase the score across nodejs repos? |
Currently, only this repo. The plan is to perform this for all the repos in the org. |
If we fix remaining issues with token permissions the score will up to ~9.2 For fuzzing I don't think that applicable here. We can also improve the score by completing the |
We can explore how I completed the |
CII-Best-Practices seems interesting. |
UPDATE From #961
|
UPDATE from #981
|
This issue is stale because it has been open many days with no activity. It will be closed soon unless the stale label is removed or a comment is made. |
This issue is stale because it has been open many days with no activity. It will be closed soon unless the stale label is removed or a comment is made. |
I'm closing it since we've achieved our goal of improving the scorecard and now, we're monitoring the score on each meeting. |
Following https://github.com/nodejs/security-wg/blob/main/tools/ossf_scorecard/report.md + Code Scanning, we have a few security concerns to mitigate in this repository and then improve our score. Let's use this issue to keep track of the progress:
.yml
files.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: