Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Unable to sign on a solo chain with custom signed extensions #2262

Open
Leouarz opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Unable to sign on a solo chain with custom signed extensions #2262

Leouarz opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@Leouarz
Copy link

Leouarz commented Jan 4, 2024

Hello,

Sorry if this it not the correct place to discuss this issue I have.

I currently followed all the instructions to add a custom network.
It all went fine regarding the QR code generation for specs and metadata.
Unfortunately, when trying to sign a transaction, i got the following error:

Something has gone wrong

Failed to decode extensions.
Please try updating metadata for data-avail network.
Parsing with data-avail16 metadata:
Error parsing incoming transaction content. Genesis hash values from decoded extensions and from used network specs do not match.

The thing is metadata are obviously fresh from being generated 2 mn ago. The genesis hash is ok on chain and in the vault, and the spec_number is fine too.

I definitely suspect our custom signed extension and would like to know if you have already stumbled into a similar issue as we really want to make Polkadot Vault available with Avail.

Don't hesitate in case you need more information.

@prybalko
Copy link
Contributor

prybalko commented Jan 8, 2024

Thank you for the report. This is the first ticket about this issue.

@Leouarz
Copy link
Author

Leouarz commented Jan 8, 2024

Thank you for your answer, is the link not available or i am missing something ? 😅

@prybalko
Copy link
Contributor

prybalko commented Jan 8, 2024

Oh, sorry for the confusion. I meant there were no other tickets about this issue; this is the first one. Thanks again for reporting.

@Leouarz
Copy link
Author

Leouarz commented Jan 8, 2024

Ahh, thanks for the clarification, I don't know how it will proceed from now, but know that I can help if it's needed since there's some interesting use cases and chains using signed extension (for the asset pallet, the transaction payment, and in general any custom verifications), I guess you're already aware haha.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants