Skip to content

Move to io.js? #2742

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
ghost opened this issue Dec 4, 2014 · 7 comments
Closed

Move to io.js? #2742

ghost opened this issue Dec 4, 2014 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 4, 2014

Any plan to move to io.js instead of node.js?


Want to back this issue? Place a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

@rogerwang
Copy link
Member

Yeah. I would like to do that in node-webkit 0.12.0 (this happens to be the next Node.js version ;) . Hopefully the v8 version will be closer with the one in Chromium when it moves on.

@geddski
Copy link

geddski commented Jan 14, 2015

@rogerwang is this planned for the near future or further down the road?

@rogerwang
Copy link
Member

v0.12.0-alpha1 is released with io.js

@commadelimited
Copy link

To be clear, does this mean that "NodeWebkit" is no longer "NodeWebkit" and is now "IoWebkit"? Not trying to be obtuse, but I'd like a clear answer as I'm going to be presenting NW at a conference in May.

The description on the front page of the repo still reads "Call all Node.js modules directly from DOM". I haven't really been following along with the Node/IO split, and I don't really care about it. But I want to make sure I'm communicating the correct information.

@rogerwang
Copy link
Member

Thanks for presenting NW. it's like 'io-blink' or 'io-chromium'. io.js remains compatible with the 3rd party modules which referred by 'Node.js modules'.

@OlivierCo
Copy link

So good news....

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants