You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is dubious, as a primordium is not yet a bone. Maybe AEO:0000085 ! membrane bone should be renamed "membrane element" if the goal is to have a class the groups all temporal stages of the bone.
(I know the clavicle is an interesting case with bone membrane and endochondral aspects, but the issue reported here is orthogonal to this)
n membrane bone the developmental process is as follows
1: uncondensed mesenchyme is present
2: “ is seen with a small area of condensations which spreads out
3: osteoid (bone matrix as yet unmineralised forms) where the inital condensation was, and spreads
4: mineralization then follows and eventually catches up to “almost the edge” - proliferation is in the unmineralised area
In the rat, processes 2-4 take 4 days (at most) in the mandible
In humans, CS18 last 5 days so my guess is that some mineralised bone is present by the end of the stage and it would be tricky to capture the full richness of change over CS18-20. I am not sure how to handle a change to the ontology - the question is which solution is least likely to give ambiguity when a bone is in the process of being formed.
This is dubious, as a primordium is not yet a bone. Maybe AEO:0000085 ! membrane bone should be renamed "membrane element" if the goal is to have a class the groups all temporal stages of the bone.
(I know the clavicle is an interesting case with bone membrane and endochondral aspects, but the issue reported here is orthogonal to this)
Spotted by @wdahdul in obophenotype/uberon#401
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: