We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
This is a tracking issue for possible residual behaviour in 2.1 from opam 2.0's base packages which don't make sense in 2.1 with switch invariants.
OpamClient.fixup
OpamClient.install_t
OpamSwitchCommand.install_compiler
The remaining three items are not critical for 2.1.0. However, we should also consider:
Do we still need to care about the compiler flag in the same way?
compiler
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixed with #4623
Sorry, something went wrong.
AltGr
dra27
No branches or pull requests
This is a tracking issue for possible residual behaviour in 2.1 from opam 2.0's base packages which don't make sense in 2.1 with switch invariants.
OpamClient.fixup
- base message in there, does it just want rewording? - Update remaining references to base packages #4623OpamClient.install_t
- updating the installed automatically state of base packages. That no longer matters? - Update remaining references to base packages #4623OpamSwitchCommand.install_compiler
- "Could not resolve base install" and "base package installs". I expect these messages just need re-wording. - Update remaining references to base packages #4623The remaining three items are not critical for 2.1.0. However, we should also consider:
Do we still need to care about the
compiler
flag in the same way?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: