Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
Or we can maintain our current naming convention: type(scope): summary |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
There are two options: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I think we can keep the current naming convention since most GitHub actions on the marketplace work with it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
-
Let us define our pr naming convention, and there is a proposal:
Here is an example: apache/pulsar#21048
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions