We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Good use case here:
https://lobste.rs/s/ritbgc/what_glue_languages_do_you_use_like#c_nhikri
It could have the semantics of xargs --no-run-if-empty
xargs --no-run-if-empty
Although you still want the "else" clause to print nothing, so maybe it's not that much of a win?
From #843
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think read --lines is better than each. At least for now. Then you don't have to deal with the MAX ARGV length problem.
read --lines
each
Sorry, something went wrong.
We have some tests for this
read --lines --with-eol
read --lines --qsn
Maybe wait until somebody needs it
This is basically for pipe -> array. We have write --qsn for array -> pipe. So it makes sense to have this for symmetry.
write --qsn
On a sidenote, is it possible to compile this with replxx instead of --without-readline?
That's #460
No branches or pull requests
Good use case here:
https://lobste.rs/s/ritbgc/what_glue_languages_do_you_use_like#c_nhikri
It could have the semantics of
xargs --no-run-if-empty
Although you still want the "else" clause to print nothing, so maybe it's not that much of a win?
From #843
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: