Skip to content

Evaluate using Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and Post-Link Optimization (PLO) #41

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Open
zamazan4ik opened this issue Dec 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@zamazan4ik
Copy link

Hi!

Recently I checked Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and Post-Link Optimization (PLO) improvements on multiple projects. The results are available here. According to the tests, these optimizations can help with achieving better performance in many compilers and compiler-like things: Clang, GCC, Rustc, CPython, etc. Since this, I think trying to optimize the Onyx ecosystem with PGO and PLO can be a good idea.

I can suggest the following action points:

  • Perform PGO benchmarks on Onyx (compiler, interpreter, maybe something else). If it shows improvements - add a note to the documentation about possible improvements in performance with PGO.
  • Providing an easier way (e.g. a build option) to build scripts with PGO can be helpful for the end-users and maintainers since they will be able to optimize the Onyx tooling according to their workloads.
  • Optimize pre-built Onyx binaries

Testing Post-Link Optimization techniques (like LLVM BOLT) would be interesting too (Clang and Rustc already use BOLT as an addition to PGO) but I recommend starting from the usual PGO.

Examples of how PGO optimization is integrated into other projects:

I have some examples of how PGO information looks in the documentation:

Regarding LLVM BOLT integration, I have the following examples:

I hope these ideas could be interesting for someone from the Onyx community. Even if right now possibly investing resources into this would be too early for Onyx - it could be a good idea for future improvements.

@brendanfh brendanfh self-assigned this Dec 2, 2023
@brendanfh brendanfh added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 2, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants