You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This may become relevant if it is approved as an Internet Standard?
Introduction
There are many JSON-based standards and formats that require the need
to express a link. Examples can be found in [draft-kelly-json-hal],
[JSON-API], [WEBTHING], [draft-nottingham-json-home],
[COLLECTIONJSON], [SIREN] and many others.
Because there hasn't been an accepted reference for serializing Web
Links in JSON, it's typical for authors of new formats to invent
their own. This has resulted in many minor differences between
serializations, making it difficult to write generic parsers.
This document is an attempt to define a standard JSON serialization
for Web linking. A primary goal is to define a format that's
relatively uncontroversial and similar to existing serializations.
Furthermore, this specification defines an optional format for groups
of links and a recommendation for defining document-wide links.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It indeed is relevant, if it moves to RFC status. However, we will only be able to use it, if it is consistent with what we have done in the standard as we don't want to break backwards compatibility. So far this seems to be the case including the document-level links, with the exception that we only have href as required in the schema and the draft has rel as required, too. Since we add requirements on rel for all links (I think), we could also make it required, too.
In fact, rel probably should be required anyhow as a result of the dependency to RFC 8288.
I came across this IETF Internet-Draft: JSON serialization for Web Linking.
This may become relevant if it is approved as an Internet Standard?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: