[PRE REVIEW]: EMRI_MC: A GPU-based code for Bayesian inference of EMRI waveforms

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @ippocratiss/ (Ippocratis Saltas)
Repository: https://github.com/ippocratiss/EMRI_MC
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: v1.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3f2f92d97b79135ce83ef13ea7c48da7"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3f2f92d97b79135ce83ef13ea7c48da7/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3f2f92d97b79135ce83ef13ea7c48da7/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3f2f92d97b79135ce83ef13ea7c48da7)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ippocratiss/. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ippocratiss/ if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: paper.md

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: paper.md

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[dfm]

@editorialbot set main as branch

[editorialbot]

Done! branch is now main

[dfm]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (282.5 files/s, 59150.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TeX                              1             70              0            664
Python                           4            144            356            264
Markdown                         2            103              0            177
Jupyter Notebook                 2              0            240             53
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            10            318            600           1176
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 3762

[dfm]

@editorialbot check references

[dfm]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.062009 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9cd4 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9129 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.191101 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104037 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/031 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/050 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/05/030 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023510 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.082005 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.042003 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/24/17/R01 is OK
- 10.12942/lrr-2011-7 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6633/aae552 is OK
- 10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_38-1 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104014 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.051102 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104033 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151102 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.241402 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.064047 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRev.131.435 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B1224 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/32/23/232002 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044005 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.064005 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.044002 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.064037 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.024005 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.091102 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044044 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.024067 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/012 is OK
- 10.1007/s10714-022-03016-0 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.024016 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.7089 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6274 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/ab1101 is OK
- 10.1088/1742-6596/840/1/012024 is OK
- 10.1086/670067 is OK
- 10.1088/0264-9381/29/14/145014 is OK
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.025001 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.042001 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6382/aa85fa is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.103012 is OK
- 10.1007/s41114-022-00036-9 is OK
- 10.1007/s41114-023-00045-2 is OK
- 10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y is OK
- 10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1142/9789811258251_0157 may be a valid DOI for title: Modified gravity, gravitational waves and the large-scale structure of the Universe: A brief report

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

GRChombo: An adaptable numerical relativity code for fundamental physics
Submitting author: @kaclough
Handling editor: @rkurchin (Active)
Reviewers: @sbozzolo, @rashti-alireza
Similarity score: 0.8062

emcee v3: A Python ensemble sampling toolkit for affine-invariant MCMC
Submitting author: @dfm
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @benjaminrose, @mattpitkin
Similarity score: 0.8015

swyft: Truncated Marginal Neural Ratio Estimation in Python
Submitting author: @bkmi
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @mattpitkin, @olgadoronina
Similarity score: 0.8000

emg3d: A multigrid solver for 3D electromagnetic diffusion
Submitting author: @prisae
Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active)
Reviewers: @akelbert, @emersodb, @lukeolson
Similarity score: 0.7999

iharm3D: Vectorized General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics
Submitting author: @bprather
Handling editor: @eloisabentivegna (Active)
Reviewers: @bgiacoma, @cpalenzuela
Similarity score: 0.7981

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[dfm]

@editorialbot query scope

@ippocratiss — Thanks for your submission! Given the limited size and history of the code base, and the limited documentation, packaging, and testing, I have submitted this pre-review for editorial review. This usually takes a week or two and I'll report back here as soon as I hear back from the rest of the editorial board. Thanks for your patience!

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[dfm]

@editorialbot reject

@ippocratiss — Apologies, I actually misspoke above. Given that this submission includes fewer than 300 lines of code, it is JOSS policy to desk reject such a minor submission. This is not a judgement on the scientific merit of the software, but such a submission is not considered within scope of the journal. Please feel free to consider a re-submission if the code reaches a more mature state.

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.