-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Better benchmarks #79
Comments
Though I've added some additional benchmarking support, this should be an on-going process. Moving out of 2.6 release. |
Could you also please include a Scala Native comparison with slogging (https://github.com/jokade/slogging)? Thanks! |
@david-bouyssie, I'd be happy to, but this is way down on my priority list. If you'd be interested in contributing a PR I'd absolutely include the results in the next benchmark results. |
Not a high priority neither on my side, it was just a suggestion for your next iteration. |
Scribe wins over Slogging for the name alone. :-p |
Great work with the library. I think the current benchmarks might be a bit outdated. The benchmark numbers would be more complete if scribe was benchmarked against log4j's disruptor-based async logger. |
@jvican that's a great point. Any chance you have any interest in putting together a PR to represent that well? Where possible I prefer not to be the one to implement competitor loggers to avoid being accused of slanting in Scribe's favor. |
1.) Better tooling to expose performance flaws
2.) Additional benchmarks to show more features of Scribe
3.) A library to generate graphical reports on the benchmark results
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: