You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm opening this issue as a feature request to add support for using an AWS DynamoDB table as the cache backend. I have already implemented a BaseCache implementation that uses DynamoDB, and I'm opening this issue so I can submit a pull request, and link it to this issue.
DynamoDB is a convenient cache backend for AWS users. It's a serverless service, so there's no redis or memcache cluster to maintain. It has a builtin TTL feature to automatically delete items when they expire based on a timestamp field in the items. If a table is configured with PAY_PER_REQUEST billing mode, then you only pay for the throughput you use, which is great for low traffic services. I don't know how its performance compares to redis or memcache; the main appeal for me is the ease of setup and maintenance, and low cost for low traffic services.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm opening this issue as a feature request to add support for using an AWS DynamoDB table as the cache backend. I have already implemented a BaseCache implementation that uses DynamoDB, and I'm opening this issue so I can submit a pull request, and link it to this issue.
DynamoDB is a convenient cache backend for AWS users. It's a serverless service, so there's no redis or memcache cluster to maintain. It has a builtin TTL feature to automatically delete items when they expire based on a timestamp field in the items. If a table is configured with PAY_PER_REQUEST billing mode, then you only pay for the throughput you use, which is great for low traffic services. I don't know how its performance compares to redis or memcache; the main appeal for me is the ease of setup and maintenance, and low cost for low traffic services.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: