Skip to content

BUG:FutureWarning for palette parameter without hue in faceted distributions #61276

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
3 tasks done
lavaeagle2 opened this issue Apr 12, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed
3 tasks done
Labels

Comments

@lavaeagle2
Copy link

Pandas version checks

  • I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.

  • I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.

  • I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.

Reproducible Example

import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Sample data
tips = sns.load_dataset("tips")

# Faceted distribution plot
sns.displot(data=tips, x="total_bill", palette="viridis")
plt.show()

Issue Description

When using faceted distributions with Seaborn and passing the palette parameter without assigning hue, a FutureWarning is raised. The warning suggests assigning hue and setting legend=False to avoid deprecation in future versions (v0.14.0). This behavior needs clarification or adjustment in Pandas' integration with Seaborn plotting functions.
observed behavior:
FutureWarning: Passing palette without assigning hue is deprecated and will be removed in v0.14.0. Assign the y variable to hue and set legend=False for the same effect.

Expected Behavior

The warning should either be suppressed or handled gracefully within Pandas' plotting functions when interfacing with Seaborn.

Installed Versions

/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/_distutils_hack/init.py:31: UserWarning: Setuptools is replacing distutils. Support for replacing an already imported distutils is deprecated. In the future, this condition will fail. Register concerns at https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/new?template=distutils-deprecation.yml
warnings.warn(

INSTALLED VERSIONS

commit : d9cdd2e
python : 3.11.12.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Linux
OS-release : 6.1.85+
Version : #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jun 27 21:05:47 UTC 2024
machine : x86_64
processor : x86_64
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : en_US.UTF-8
LANG : en_US.UTF-8
LOCALE : en_US.UTF-8

pandas : 2.2.2
numpy : 2.0.2
pytz : 2025.2
dateutil : 2.8.2
setuptools : 75.2.0
pip : 24.1.2
Cython : 3.0.12
pytest : 8.3.5
hypothesis : None
sphinx : 8.2.3
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : 5.3.1
html5lib : 1.1
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : 2.9.10
jinja2 : 3.1.6
IPython : 7.34.0
pandas_datareader : 0.10.0
adbc-driver-postgresql: None
adbc-driver-sqlite : None
bs4 : 4.13.3
bottleneck : 1.4.2
dataframe-api-compat : None
fastparquet : None
fsspec : 2025.3.2
gcsfs : 2025.3.2
matplotlib : 3.10.0
numba : 0.60.0
numexpr : 2.10.2
odfpy : None
openpyxl : 3.1.5
pandas_gbq : 0.28.0
pyarrow : 18.1.0
pyreadstat : None
python-calamine : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : 1.14.1
sqlalchemy : 2.0.40
tables : 3.10.2
tabulate : 0.9.0
xarray : 2025.1.2
xlrd : 2.0.1
zstandard : 0.23.0
tzdata : 2025.2
qtpy : None
pyqt5 : None

Image

@lavaeagle2 lavaeagle2 added Bug Needs Triage Issue that has not been reviewed by a pandas team member labels Apr 12, 2025
@rhshadrach
Copy link
Member

This behavior needs clarification or adjustment in Pandas' integration with Seaborn plotting functions.

Can you clarify why you think this is a pandas issue?

The warning should either be suppressed or handled gracefully within Pandas' plotting functions when interfacing with Seaborn.

As far as I can tell there is no point in the callstack where seaborn is passing over control to pandas, so this is not technically possible.

I think you need to raise an issue with Seaborn, although I don't understand why you think the current warning is not appropriate.

@rhshadrach rhshadrach added Visualization plotting Closing Candidate May be closeable, needs more eyeballs and removed Needs Triage Issue that has not been reviewed by a pandas team member labels Apr 13, 2025
@lavaeagle2
Copy link
Author

Thank you for the clarification.

You're right — after reviewing the call stack and the behavior more carefully, I can see that this warning originates directly from Seaborn, not from Pandas.
I appreciate your explanation, and I’ll move this issue over to the Seaborn repository instead.

Thanks again for the quick response and guidance!

@rhshadrach rhshadrach removed the Closing Candidate May be closeable, needs more eyeballs label Apr 26, 2025
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants