-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Release version 1.3.3/1.4.0 and syncing the branches #155
Comments
FYI: I've re-milestoned the above listed PRs to |
I've prepared a The builds pass for the 1.4.0 release branch, with the exception of PHP 8.4, but this is not due to this package not being compatible, but due to Nette Tester 1.0 not being compatible with PHP 8.4. Target release date: Tuesday March 19 (providing @grogy responds in time). |
@grogy Would be great to get this out of the door and as PRs can't be merged with an approval, I can't do anything about this without you getting involved. When can we get this done ? |
In the mean time, the 1.4.0 release has gone out 🎉 @grogy and me discussed the branching today in a call and the conclusion was basically that it would probably be best to work towards getting the 2.0 release tagged soonish and to then drop support for the 1.x branch. |
Setting the scene
A couple of years back, a number of things were proposed for version 2.0 and work was started on that, but there has been little progress in the past year or so.
In practice this means that there is now one commit (#148) in
master
, which is not indevelop
(which is why Dependabot is not yet running) and - aside from thev2
specific patches - there are also a number of commits indevelop
which should be ported tomaster
.How to move forward
To make merges and releases more straight forward again, I think it would be good to get the branches back in sync and change strategies a little.
There are basically two options:
develop
tomaster
and visa versa.The milestone of the cherrypicked commits should be updated from
2.0.0
to1.3.x Next
.This will largely keep things as they are now workflow wise, but keeps the mental overhead of the two branches potentially diverging and having to cherrypick and such.
develop
tomaster
and then rebasedevelop
on top ofmaster
.This should be combined with setting the
default
branch back tomaster
, rebasing currently open and viable PRs againstmaster
if they are not part of the larger changes for 2.0 and don't contain breaking changes (and switching the branch these PRs are pulled against).Moving forward, PRs should be pulled against
master
(with the exception of 2.0 specific PRs) and when PRs are merged, themaster
branch should be merged into thedevelop
branch, untildevelop
is ready for the 2.0 release.Note: This change does mean that people with active forks, will have to reset their
develop
branch.I'd advocate for strategy 2, but would like to hear opinions.
Detailed proposal
I'd be happy to get this sorted and to put the work in to make it happen.
Independently of which workflow is used, I believe the following changes should be included in the next release/cherrypicked to
master
:fail-fast
with setup-php when creating the binaries #131develop
.I intend to do some test runs in the next few hours to make sure we'll have a passing build on
master
with the changes as proposed.I'll also start preparing the changelog for the
1.3.x
release (or1.4.0
, I'll have a look what it should be when I prepare the changelog).@grogy What do you think ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: