-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Fix Common Coin use in Agreement
.
#37
Comments
As suggested in the link to the description of the bug above, we use the approach of the paper "Cobalt: BFT Governance in Open Networks", https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07240 , section 4.3.2. This is yet another important paper in the context of |
It'd be great to come up with adversarial tests attacking the optimistic common coin schedule of #69. So that we test the difference from the paper version of Honey Badger. |
Apart from the tests, this is done. But the |
Closing this, since we have #228 for the missing test. |
The algorithm needs a third round of messages (
Conf
), otherwise an adversary that controls the network scheduler and one node can potentially stall agreement: amiller/HoneyBadgerBFT#59The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: