You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all thanks for providing the nice implementation of the Marching Squares algorithm.
I've noticed some inconsistencies for various edge cases (literal "edge"-cases). I'm testing a simple 4x4 grayscale input data where all the values are 0 except one of the corners and a threshold of 0.5. Depending on which corner is set to 1, the number of mesh points varies between 3, 5, and 8. As a result, the boundary extraction also gives significantly different results of what (I think) should just be shaped which are rotated versions of each other.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
First of all thanks for providing the nice implementation of the Marching Squares algorithm.
I've noticed some inconsistencies for various edge cases (literal "edge"-cases). I'm testing a simple 4x4 grayscale input data where all the values are 0 except one of the corners and a threshold of 0.5. Depending on which corner is set to 1, the number of mesh points varies between 3, 5, and 8. As a result, the boundary extraction also gives significantly different results of what (I think) should just be shaped which are rotated versions of each other.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: