-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 620
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Add more options to create_supervised_trainer #1235
Comments
I would like to work on this. |
@apthagowda97 sure, please go ahead. I assign you to this issue |
@apthagowda97 any updates on this ? Anyway, do not hesitate to ask question if something is not clear about the issue. |
By going through issue #419 its best to add gradient clipping to |
@apthagowda97 I think it is better let's keep the same name and add the options. Such that there is one multi-option helper function. |
@apthagowda97 any updates on this issue ? |
Sorry I was busy from past few days. I ll try to finish it Asap. |
Cross-posted from #1589 We discussed this PR and related issue with the team and we think that we should explore a bit different approach. Helper method Probably, it would more helpful to provide public methods like:
and inside Basically, the idea is something like that : def get_training_step_1(a):
def training_step(e, b):
print(a, e, b)
return training_step
def get_training_step_2(a):
def training_step(e, b):
print(a, e, b, "with amp")
return training_step
def create_supervised_trainer(a, opt):
training_step = None
if opt == 1:
training_step = get_training_step_1(a)
elif opt == 2:
training_step = get_training_step_2(a)
e = Engine(training_step)
return e |
🚀 Feature
Idea is to add more options to
create_supervised_trainer
helper:create_supervised_trainer()
#419For Hacktoberfest/PyDataGlobal contributors, feel free to ask questions for details if any and say that you would like to tackle the issue.
Please, take a look at CONTRIBUTING guide.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: