Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Client side web search? #1413

Open
chrisspen opened this issue Jul 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Client side web search? #1413

chrisspen opened this issue Jul 10, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@chrisspen
Copy link

Does Tantivy support client side web search, specifically through lazy loading or incrementally loading slices of an index?

I see in the docs it supports incremental index creation, but there's no mention of client side search. Is this only meant to run on the server side?

I have a large (~1 million) collection of documents that I want to make searchable via the browser with no search server, and it's impractical for the user to load a hundreds-of-MB search index.

@ChillFish8
Copy link
Collaborator

Realistically, you'd probably have a hard time either way with the amount of data required, it'd simply be easier using something like a Lambda if you really didn't want a dedicated server running.

The requirement is basically, you need WASM support which isn't supported right out of the box: see #541 and #1067

Another example that might be of some interest to you https://jakejscott.com/full-text-search-for-dynamodb-using-lambda-efs-tantivy-and-rust

@chrisspen
Copy link
Author

I was hoping to avoid any proprietary tech too, aside from large scale cheap storage like S3.

Since most client-side search uses static index files, I was hoping to find something that supports sharding the indexes based on keyword range, and then loading them dynamically based on the search terms.

I'm working on a proof of concept on my own, but I find it hard to believe I'm the only one who would find this useful. I've used DynamoDB and Lambda, and they're good for certain things, but they're still a lot more expensive than loading simple static index files and letting the client due the heavy lifting.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants