We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
The Isabelle proof added in #206 only talks about how the settlement algorithm works with the up-to-date balance proofs.
For older balance proofs, it's worthwhile proving that the party who submits an older balance proof can only lose tokens.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@loredanacirstea 's comment #206 (comment) on what has to be done.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The Isabelle proof added in #206 only talks about how the settlement algorithm works with the up-to-date balance proofs.
For older balance proofs, it's worthwhile proving that the party who submits an older balance proof can only lose tokens.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: