-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
[Epic] Holes in our evaluation model #2127
Comments
Submitted by: BrianH Missing functions:
Breaks in the model:
Filling in the coverage gaps (some not as critical):
More will links be added later. |
#2061 fixed in: Oldes/Rebol3@6d14eea |
#2062 fixed in Oldes/Rebol3@27278b6 |
#1756 fixed in zsx/r3@b275787 and Oldes/Rebol3@2abd4c2 |
#2051 modified in Oldes/Rebol3@3385185 ( |
#2122 fixed in Oldes/Rebol3@690dffa |
This was referenced Feb 15, 2020
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Submitted by: BrianH
For Rebol 3 we have done a lot to clean up our semantics, and build a much cleaner, more uniform, more intentionally designed evaluation model. Between the rebalancing of error triggering, or of none propagation, or of type conversions, we're well on our way to making a much more solid base for us to build on going forward.
However, we still have some holes in the new model that need fixing or filling in. This is a list of the minor changes, fixes or additions that we should do before 3.0, at least ones that aren't referenced in the other epics (though a few of those too). Limited to semantic model or API changes - we can fix bugs while we're at it, but semantic model changes need to go in before the 3.0 release sets an expectation of continuing compatibility.
Related tickets in the first comment, to make linking easier. Status will be updated there.
CC - Data [ Version: r3 master Type: Issue Platform: All Category: Evaluation Reproduce: Always Fixed-in:none ]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: