You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If you use impact due to COVID as a stratification parameter, and your treatment was active during the onset of COVID, how do you know you're getting COVID impact and not treatment impact during stratification?
Per Steve Schmidt's question
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for posting this Mariano. Clarifying my question/concern --
If treated customers are assigned to stratification bins based on "COVID-like" changes in energy use during the COVID period (e.g. "fractional change in usage"), and they were undergoing program treatment at the same time, it seems to me energy changes due to the program might cause them to be put in the wrong bin, and get an incorrect adjustment.
Using the effect of COVID to stratify program participants seems problematic, at least for residential behavioral programs where energy profile changes can vary widely both from the program treatment(s) and from COVID impacts.
To avoid this, bins could be created based only on pre-COVID characteristics.
If you use impact due to COVID as a stratification parameter, and your treatment was active during the onset of COVID, how do you know you're getting COVID impact and not treatment impact during stratification?
Per Steve Schmidt's question
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: