-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
False positive warnings? #291
Comments
The unresolved links look like they are happening in the Is this the repo and branch you are using? You could try pointing to the Hope this helps. |
Yes, indeed the warning is generated by the files that point to The odd thing is that the warnings report a path with So is the warning supposed to offer a suggested change, or is it reporting a wrong path at that line? Both would be wrong, so it looks like a bug to me. What do you think? |
BTW, the files are in the same dir so the relative path should not have any |
Can you link us to a repo and branches with these pages? We would really prefer to us the exact same files so that we know for sure that we are testing the same thing. |
Sure, that's better. For brevity I omitted most of the warnings, and while I was showing a couple of examples, I was actually referring to others, hence the confusion. Sorry. Please, checkout the branch retype. Cd into First there are a few legit warnings about Back to the original problem: please, open the |
I've found a clue. For some reason the many warnings are down to a few now (after saving twice the The few that are still there have an italic wrapping the link, like in the following example: _(see [link](path))_ While that should be a legit usage of markdown, it looks like it somehow messes up the retype parser/code. |
Interesting. We will dig into this and try to figure out what's going wrong. |
Yep, there is something strange going on. We have reproduced the issue and have begun our investigation. There's something about those italic underscores |
okay, looks like we have this one fixed. No related The fix will be included in the next Retype release, which will likely be Thanks for letting us know about this issue. It was certainly an interesting and challenging problem. |
Thank you for the quick action! |
Editing one file (
how-to.md
) that contains quite a lot of links, I get a long list of warnings like:I am not sure what "Consider revising URL" means, since the indicated lines in my files are not including the
../../
prefix in the link-path.Is retype trying to suggest me that I should prefix them with
../../
? That would be wrong because the files containing the links and the target are siblings in the same dir. The links work well as they are now, and changing would actually break the links.Could you clarify what that means?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: