-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Consistent request spec naming #2378
Conversation
Controller generators are using a different naming scheme for requests specs that are now generated by default. Use always `spec/requests/posts_spec.rb` by default. This
[skip ci]
Thanks for getting this over the line @klyonrad |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also thanks for finishing this up. Got one question though
generate('rspec:request wombats') | ||
|
||
# request specs are now the default | ||
generate('rspec:controller wombats --no-request-specs --controller-specs --no-view-specs') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Funny, I didn't know that about this generator. But to be honest I don't understand the purpose of this line 🤔
One more testing of controller specs? I thought the whole issue was about request specs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The rspec:
bit means just the rspec generator, not the rails generator, so its the same as invoking controller wombats ...
only it does't produce a controller.
One more testing of controller specs? I thought the whole issue was about request specs
This is fixing an issue the rename raised, this lines original purpose was to complete the coverage of the generators.
At the time the lines above generated controller specs for wombats, so we added a request spec to complete the mix. When the default became request specs this should have changed to a controller spec to restore the coverage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the rename showed a duplicate spec being generated, which resolving the original coverage issue solves.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, now I see what you were reading into those lines... I was interpreting them in a very different way.
I thought that
generate('rspec:request wombats')
generate('integration_test widgets')
were just for testing the RequestSpecGenerator or to have test coverage of request specs in general.
The
rspec:
bit means just the rspec generator, not the rails generator, so its the same as invokingcontroller wombats ...
only it does't produce a controller.
But couldn't this be also achieved (and be more explicit) by changing line 87 to generate('controller wombats index --controller-specs')
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yep I guess that'd also work
Bare minimum changes required to get consistent spec naming, replaces #2376