Skip to content

Template in mdpi_template is outdated #369

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
3 tasks done
JVAQUEROM opened this issue Jan 26, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #515
Closed
3 tasks done

Template in mdpi_template is outdated #369

JVAQUEROM opened this issue Jan 26, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #515
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement

Comments

@JVAQUEROM
Copy link

I just wanted to report that mdpi_journal template is outdated. New mdpi.cls does not include \history{}, for example, and now it consists of three commands: \datereceived{}, \dateaccepted{} and \datepublished{}. Some other small details may have changed too, but I do not think this is a big update. I installed the last version of rticles:

> xfun::session_info('rticles')
R version 4.0.3 (2020-10-10)
Platform: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu (64-bit)
Running under: openSUSE Leap 15.2, RStudio 1.3.1073

Locale:
  LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8       LC_NUMERIC=C               LC_TIME=es_ES.UTF-8       
  LC_COLLATE=es_ES.UTF-8     LC_MONETARY=es_ES.UTF-8    LC_MESSAGES=es_ES.UTF-8   
  LC_PAPER=es_ES.UTF-8       LC_NAME=C                  LC_ADDRESS=C              
  LC_TELEPHONE=C             LC_MEASUREMENT=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C       

Package version:
  base64enc_0.1.4   digest_0.6.27     evaluate_0.14     glue_1.4.2       
  graphics_4.0.3    grDevices_4.0.3   highr_0.8         htmltools_0.5.1.1
  jsonlite_1.7.2    knitr_1.30        magrittr_2.0.1    markdown_1.1     
  methods_4.0.3     mime_0.9          Rcpp_1.0.6        rlang_0.4.10     
  rmarkdown_2.6.6   rticles_0.18.3    stats_4.0.3       stringi_1.5.3    
  stringr_1.4.0     tinytex_0.29.1    tools_4.0.3       utils_4.0.3      
  xfun_0.20         yaml_2.2.1       

Best regards.


By filing an issue to this repo, I promise that

  • I have fully read the issue guide at https://yihui.name/issue/.
  • I have provided the necessary information about my issue.
    • If I'm asking a question, I have already asked it on Stack Overflow or RStudio Community, waited for at least 24 hours, and included a link to my question there.
    • If I'm filing a bug report, I have included a minimal, self-contained, and reproducible example, and have also included xfun::session_info('rticles'). I have upgraded all my packages to their latest versions (e.g., R, RStudio, and R packages), and also tried the development version: remotes::install_github('rstudio/rticles').
    • If I have posted the same issue elsewhere, I have also mentioned it in this issue.
  • I have learned the Github Markdown syntax, and formatted my issue correctly.

I understand that my issue may be closed if I don't fulfill my promises.

@cderv
Copy link
Collaborator

cderv commented Jan 26, 2021

Thanks for the update @JVAQUEROM !

Would you like to open a PR to update this template ?

pinging @dleutnant who contributed the template initially.

@JVAQUEROM
Copy link
Author

Yes, I'll try to update it when I have some spare time.

I wish in the future publishers provide a Rmd template themselves...

Thank you for this awesome idea for scientific writing

@mrajeev08 mrajeev08 mentioned this issue Apr 6, 2021
1 task
@cderv cderv added feature a feature request or enhancement and removed enhancement labels Jul 19, 2021
@cderv cderv linked a pull request Apr 17, 2023 that will close this issue
12 tasks
@github-actions
Copy link

This old thread has been automatically locked. If you think you have found something related to this, please open a new issue by following the issue guide (https://yihui.org/issue/), and link to this old issue if necessary.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 23, 2023
# for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? #.
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants