Unrolled build for rust-lang#120302

Rollup merge of rust-lang#120302 - oli-obk:const_intern_cleanups, r=RalfJung

various const interning cleanups

After rust-lang#119044 I noticed that some things can be simplified and refactored.

This is also a requirement for rust-lang#116564 as there we'll need to treat the base allocation differently from the others

r? ````@RalfJung````

Author: rust-timer

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/eval_queries.rs

@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
-use std::mem;
-
 use either::{Left, Right};
 
 use rustc_hir::def::DefKind;
@@ -24,12 +22,13 @@ use crate::interpret::{
 };
 
 // Returns a pointer to where the result lives
+#[instrument(level = "trace", skip(ecx, body), ret)]
 fn eval_body_using_ecx<'mir, 'tcx>(
     ecx: &mut CompileTimeEvalContext<'mir, 'tcx>,
     cid: GlobalId<'tcx>,
     body: &'mir mir::Body<'tcx>,
 ) -> InterpResult<'tcx, MPlaceTy<'tcx>> {
-    debug!("eval_body_using_ecx: {:?}, {:?}", cid, ecx.param_env);
+    trace!(?ecx.param_env);
     let tcx = *ecx.tcx;
     assert!(
         cid.promoted.is_some()
@@ -75,11 +74,8 @@ fn eval_body_using_ecx<'mir, 'tcx>(
             None => InternKind::Constant,
         }
     };
-    let check_alignment = mem::replace(&mut ecx.machine.check_alignment, CheckAlignment::No); // interning doesn't need to respect alignment
     intern_const_alloc_recursive(ecx, intern_kind, &ret)?;
-    ecx.machine.check_alignment = check_alignment;
 
-    debug!("eval_body_using_ecx done: {:?}", ret);
     Ok(ret)
 }
 

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intern.rs

@@ -41,13 +41,12 @@ pub trait CompileTimeMachine<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, T> = Machine<
 /// allocation is interned immutably; if it is `Mutability::Mut`, then the allocation *must be*
 /// already mutable (as a sanity check).
 ///
-/// `recursive_alloc` is called for all recursively encountered allocations.
+/// Returns an iterator over all relocations referred to by this allocation.
 fn intern_shallow<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx, T, M: CompileTimeMachine<'mir, 'tcx, T>>(
     ecx: &'rt mut InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M>,
     alloc_id: AllocId,
     mutability: Mutability,
-    mut recursive_alloc: impl FnMut(&InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M>, CtfeProvenance),
-) -> Result<(), ()> {
+) -> Result<impl Iterator<Item = CtfeProvenance> + 'tcx, ()> {
     trace!("intern_shallow {:?}", alloc_id);
     // remove allocation
     let Some((_kind, mut alloc)) = ecx.memory.alloc_map.remove(&alloc_id) else {
@@ -65,14 +64,10 @@ fn intern_shallow<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx, T, M: CompileTimeMachine<'mir, 'tcx, T>>(
             assert_eq!(alloc.mutability, Mutability::Mut);
         }
     }
-    // record child allocations
-    for &(_, prov) in alloc.provenance().ptrs().iter() {
-        recursive_alloc(ecx, prov);
-    }
     // link the alloc id to the actual allocation
     let alloc = ecx.tcx.mk_const_alloc(alloc);
     ecx.tcx.set_alloc_id_memory(alloc_id, alloc);
-    Ok(())
+    Ok(alloc.0.0.provenance().ptrs().iter().map(|&(_, prov)| prov))
 }
 
 /// How a constant value should be interned.
@@ -128,12 +123,16 @@ pub fn intern_const_alloc_recursive<
         }
     };
 
-    // Initialize recursive interning.
+    // Intern the base allocation, and initialize todo list for recursive interning.
     let base_alloc_id = ret.ptr().provenance.unwrap().alloc_id();
-    let mut todo = vec![(base_alloc_id, base_mutability)];
+    // First we intern the base allocation, as it requires a different mutability.
+    // This gives us the initial set of nested allocations, which will then all be processed
+    // recursively in the loop below.
+    let mut todo: Vec<_> =
+        intern_shallow(ecx, base_alloc_id, base_mutability).unwrap().map(|prov| prov).collect();
     // We need to distinguish "has just been interned" from "was already in `tcx`",
     // so we track this in a separate set.
-    let mut just_interned = FxHashSet::default();
+    let mut just_interned: FxHashSet<_> = std::iter::once(base_alloc_id).collect();
     // Whether we encountered a bad mutable pointer.
     // We want to first report "dangling" and then "mutable", so we need to delay reporting these
     // errors.
@@ -147,52 +146,56 @@ pub fn intern_const_alloc_recursive<
     // raw pointers, so we cannot rely on validation to catch them -- and since interning runs
     // before validation, and interning doesn't know the type of anything, this means we can't show
     // better errors. Maybe we should consider doing validation before interning in the future.
-    while let Some((alloc_id, mutability)) = todo.pop() {
+    while let Some(prov) = todo.pop() {
+        let alloc_id = prov.alloc_id();
+        // Crucially, we check this *before* checking whether the `alloc_id`
+        // has already been interned. The point of this check is to ensure that when
+        // there are multiple pointers to the same allocation, they are *all* immutable.
+        // Therefore it would be bad if we only checked the first pointer to any given
+        // allocation.
+        // (It is likely not possible to actually have multiple pointers to the same allocation,
+        // so alternatively we could also check that and ICE if there are multiple such pointers.)
+        if intern_kind != InternKind::Promoted
+            && inner_mutability == Mutability::Not
+            && !prov.immutable()
+        {
+            if ecx.tcx.try_get_global_alloc(alloc_id).is_some()
+                && !just_interned.contains(&alloc_id)
+            {
+                // This is a pointer to some memory from another constant. We encounter mutable
+                // pointers to such memory since we do not always track immutability through
+                // these "global" pointers. Allowing them is harmless; the point of these checks
+                // during interning is to justify why we intern the *new* allocations immutably,
+                // so we can completely ignore existing allocations. We also don't need to add
+                // this to the todo list, since after all it is already interned.
+                continue;
+            }
+            // Found a mutable pointer inside a const where inner allocations should be
+            // immutable. We exclude promoteds from this, since things like `&mut []` and
+            // `&None::<Cell<i32>>` lead to promotion that can produce mutable pointers. We rely
+            // on the promotion analysis not screwing up to ensure that it is sound to intern
+            // promoteds as immutable.
+            found_bad_mutable_pointer = true;
+        }
         if ecx.tcx.try_get_global_alloc(alloc_id).is_some() {
             // Already interned.
             debug_assert!(!ecx.memory.alloc_map.contains_key(&alloc_id));
             continue;
         }
         just_interned.insert(alloc_id);
-        intern_shallow(ecx, alloc_id, mutability, |ecx, prov| {
-            let alloc_id = prov.alloc_id();
-            if intern_kind != InternKind::Promoted
-                && inner_mutability == Mutability::Not
-                && !prov.immutable()
-            {
-                if ecx.tcx.try_get_global_alloc(alloc_id).is_some()
-                    && !just_interned.contains(&alloc_id)
-                {
-                    // This is a pointer to some memory from another constant. We encounter mutable
-                    // pointers to such memory since we do not always track immutability through
-                    // these "global" pointers. Allowing them is harmless; the point of these checks
-                    // during interning is to justify why we intern the *new* allocations immutably,
-                    // so we can completely ignore existing allocations. We also don't need to add
-                    // this to the todo list, since after all it is already interned.
-                    return;
-                }
-                // Found a mutable pointer inside a const where inner allocations should be
-                // immutable. We exclude promoteds from this, since things like `&mut []` and
-                // `&None::<Cell<i32>>` lead to promotion that can produce mutable pointers. We rely
-                // on the promotion analysis not screwing up to ensure that it is sound to intern
-                // promoteds as immutable.
-                found_bad_mutable_pointer = true;
-            }
-            // We always intern with `inner_mutability`, and furthermore we ensured above that if
-            // that is "immutable", then there are *no* mutable pointers anywhere in the newly
-            // interned memory -- justifying that we can indeed intern immutably. However this also
-            // means we can *not* easily intern immutably here if `prov.immutable()` is true and
-            // `inner_mutability` is `Mut`: there might be other pointers to that allocation, and
-            // we'd have to somehow check that they are *all* immutable before deciding that this
-            // allocation can be made immutable. In the future we could consider analyzing all
-            // pointers before deciding which allocations can be made immutable; but for now we are
-            // okay with losing some potential for immutability here. This can anyway only affect
-            // `static mut`.
-            todo.push((alloc_id, inner_mutability));
-        })
-        .map_err(|()| {
+        // We always intern with `inner_mutability`, and furthermore we ensured above that if
+        // that is "immutable", then there are *no* mutable pointers anywhere in the newly
+        // interned memory -- justifying that we can indeed intern immutably. However this also
+        // means we can *not* easily intern immutably here if `prov.immutable()` is true and
+        // `inner_mutability` is `Mut`: there might be other pointers to that allocation, and
+        // we'd have to somehow check that they are *all* immutable before deciding that this
+        // allocation can be made immutable. In the future we could consider analyzing all
+        // pointers before deciding which allocations can be made immutable; but for now we are
+        // okay with losing some potential for immutability here. This can anyway only affect
+        // `static mut`.
+        todo.extend(intern_shallow(ecx, alloc_id, inner_mutability).map_err(|()| {
             ecx.tcx.dcx().emit_err(DanglingPtrInFinal { span: ecx.tcx.span, kind: intern_kind })
-        })?;
+        })?);
     }
     if found_bad_mutable_pointer {
         return Err(ecx
@@ -220,13 +223,13 @@ pub fn intern_const_alloc_for_constprop<
         return Ok(());
     }
     // Move allocation to `tcx`.
-    intern_shallow(ecx, alloc_id, Mutability::Not, |_ecx, _| {
+    for _ in intern_shallow(ecx, alloc_id, Mutability::Not).map_err(|()| err_ub!(DeadLocal))? {
         // We are not doing recursive interning, so we don't currently support provenance.
         // (If this assertion ever triggers, we should just implement a
         // proper recursive interning loop -- or just call `intern_const_alloc_recursive`.
         panic!("`intern_const_alloc_for_constprop` called on allocation with nested provenance")
-    })
-    .map_err(|()| err_ub!(DeadLocal).into())
+    }
+    Ok(())
 }
 
 impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: super::intern::CompileTimeMachine<'mir, 'tcx, !>>
@@ -247,15 +250,14 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: super::intern::CompileTimeMachine<'mir, 'tcx, !>>
         let dest = self.allocate(layout, MemoryKind::Stack)?;
         f(self, &dest.clone().into())?;
         let alloc_id = dest.ptr().provenance.unwrap().alloc_id(); // this was just allocated, it must have provenance
-        intern_shallow(self, alloc_id, Mutability::Not, |ecx, prov| {
+        for prov in intern_shallow(self, alloc_id, Mutability::Not).unwrap() {
             // We are not doing recursive interning, so we don't currently support provenance.
             // (If this assertion ever triggers, we should just implement a
             // proper recursive interning loop -- or just call `intern_const_alloc_recursive`.
-            if !ecx.tcx.try_get_global_alloc(prov.alloc_id()).is_some() {
+            if !self.tcx.try_get_global_alloc(prov.alloc_id()).is_some() {
                 panic!("`intern_with_temp_alloc` with nested allocations");
             }
-        })
-        .unwrap();
+        }
         Ok(alloc_id)
     }
 }