Skip to content

Tupple index vs integer literal #735

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
martin-t opened this issue Dec 30, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #814
Closed

Tupple index vs integer literal #735

martin-t opened this issue Dec 30, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #814
Labels
A-lexer Area: Lexical specification E-Easy We believe this would not be difficult to actually fix

Comments

@martin-t
Copy link

The section about integer literals got expanded in 8e79044 to include tupple inxex but the surrounding text did not.

  • It still says an integer literal has 4 forms instead of 5.

  • It talks about suffixes but a tupple index can't have a suffix. It also discussed types but a tupple index probably doesn't really have a type since it only exists at compile time.
@ehuss ehuss added A-lexer Area: Lexical specification E-Easy We believe this would not be difficult to actually fix labels Apr 4, 2020
@ehuss ehuss mentioned this issue May 16, 2020
Merged
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-lexer Area: Lexical specification E-Easy We believe this would not be difficult to actually fix
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Update tuple index token. ehuss/reference
2 participants
@ehuss @martin-t