Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Properly handle namespaces for enum configuration options #1162

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2017
Merged

Properly handle namespaces for enum configuration options #1162

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2017

Conversation

tamird
Copy link
Contributor

@tamird tamird commented Nov 27, 2017

...by using canonical_path rather than canonical_name.

Fixes #1125.

r? @emilio

@fitzgen
Copy link
Member

fitzgen commented Nov 27, 2017

Can you add a note to the unreleased section of the changelog about this breaking change? Thanks!

@fitzgen
Copy link
Member

fitzgen commented Nov 27, 2017

And did it fix the issues you were seeing in that other bug?

...by using canonical_path rather than canonical_name.

Fixes #1125.
@tamird
Copy link
Contributor Author

tamird commented Nov 27, 2017

Added a note to the changelog. I haven't had a chance to test the other issue yet, I may get to it today (but may not).

Copy link
Contributor

@emilio emilio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

@emilio
Copy link
Contributor

emilio commented Nov 28, 2017

@bors-servo r+

@bors-servo
Copy link

📌 Commit 89efc23 has been approved by emilio

@bors-servo
Copy link

⌛ Testing commit 89efc23 with merge 75f9e1c...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2017
Properly handle namespaces for enum configuration options

...by using canonical_path rather than canonical_name.

Fixes #1125.

r? @emilio
@bors-servo
Copy link

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: emilio
Pushing 75f9e1c to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 89efc23 into rust-lang:master Nov 28, 2017
@tamird tamird deleted the enum-naming-consistency branch November 28, 2017 13:19
rather than its "canonical name", which does not. This is a breaking change
that requires callers which target a namespaced C++ enum to call e.g.
`bitfield_enum("<namespace>::<enum_name>")` rather than e.g.
`bitfield_enum("<enum_name>")`. [#1162][]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants