Skip to content

Tracking Issue for AArch64 TME intrinsics #117216

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Open
3 tasks
Amanieu opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
3 tasks

Tracking Issue for AArch64 TME intrinsics #117216

Amanieu opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC O-AArch64 Armv8-A or later processors in AArch64 mode T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@Amanieu
Copy link
Member

Amanieu commented Oct 26, 2023

Feature gate: #![feature(stdarch_aarch64_tme)]

This is a tracking issue TME intrinsics on AArch64.

Public API

// core::arch::aarch64

pub const _TMSTART_SUCCESS: u64;
pub const _TMFAILURE_REASON: u64;
pub const _TMFAILURE_RTRY: u64;
pub const _TMFAILURE_CNCL: u64;
pub const _TMFAILURE_MEM: u64;
pub const _TMFAILURE_IMP: u64;
pub const _TMFAILURE_ERR: u64;
pub const _TMFAILURE_SIZE: u64;
pub const _TMFAILURE_NEST: u64;
pub const _TMFAILURE_DBG: u64;
pub const _TMFAILURE_INT: u64;
pub const _TMFAILURE_TRIVIAL: u64;

pub unsafe fn __tstart() -> u64;
pub unsafe fn __tcommit();
pub unsafe fn __tcancel<const IMM16: u64>();
pub unsafe fn __ttest() -> u64;

Steps / History

  • Implementation: #...
  • Final comment period (FCP)1
  • Stabilization PR

Unresolved Questions

  • None yet.

Footnotes

  1. https://std-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/feature-lifecycle/stabilization.html

@Amanieu Amanieu added T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC labels Oct 26, 2023
@Jules-Bertholet
Copy link
Contributor

@rustbot label o-aarch64 a-simd

@rustbot rustbot added A-SIMD Area: SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data) O-AArch64 Armv8-A or later processors in AArch64 mode labels Oct 26, 2023
@workingjubilee workingjubilee removed the A-SIMD Area: SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data) label Jun 15, 2024
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Transactional memory extensions are not SIMD, despite having previously been misclassified under stdsimd.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC O-AArch64 Armv8-A or later processors in AArch64 mode T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants