-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
i686 OSX cycle time has regressed 20% #40802
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
Also just so I don't forget it, the source I used to generate that output is: https://gist.github.com/alexcrichton/40101e6d700cd2dd0f16969807fbb87e |
@brson has thoughts on another thread |
It seems the test time varies for over 70% difference. Maybe Travis is using multiple types of OSX machines? Short: https://travis-ci.org/rust-lang/rust/builds/237034153 |
The long tests you linked are a poor comparison, since that PR hasn't merged yet and may have an underlying bug of some kind; https://travis-ci.org/rust-lang/rust/builds/236851493 is probably a better comparison point. |
Going to close as unactionable. We have better processes today to track performance regressions and this particular issue probably isn't going to get looked at. |
From https://travis-ci.org/rust-lang/rust/jobs/210149964 to https://travis-ci.org/rust-lang/rust/jobs/214694967 we've regressed cycle time by 20% unfortunately:
The list of changes is unfortunately not very illuminating ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: