Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Tracking Issue for for-loops in constants #87575

Open
jonas-schievink opened this issue Jul 29, 2021 · 9 comments
Open

Tracking Issue for for-loops in constants #87575

jonas-schievink opened this issue Jul 29, 2021 · 9 comments
Labels
A-const-eval Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...) C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC

Comments

@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

jonas-schievink commented Jul 29, 2021

This tracks #![feature(const_for)], added in #87237.

This feature depends on const_trait_impl and is not currently usable.

@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink added A-const-fn C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC labels Jul 29, 2021
@SUPERCILEX
Copy link
Contributor

Is there a tracking issue for const range iterators? Doing something like for i in 0..1000 { doesn't compile... am I missing something?

@CalinZBaenen

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@mati865

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@CalinZBaenen

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@mati865

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@CalinZBaenen

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@Tom1380

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@Crypto-Spartan
Copy link

Any updates on this?

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Aug 15, 2024

const_traits is still very unstable. @fee1-dead is doing the refactoring on this and has recently landed a major milestone. There are still many things to resolve though.

Consider sponsoring (https://github.com/sponsors/fee1-dead) as a thank you if this work is important to you

@RalfJung RalfJung added A-const-eval Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...) and removed A-const-fn labels Dec 1, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-const-eval Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...) C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants