Skip to content

add notes about rustdoc-ui and rustdoc-js tests #120

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Open
QuietMisdreavus opened this issue May 2, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

add notes about rustdoc-ui and rustdoc-js tests #120

QuietMisdreavus opened this issue May 2, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
A-test-suite Area: rust-lang/rust test suites C-enhancement Category: enhancement E-help-wanted Call for participation: extra help is wanted E-medium Difficulty: might require some prior knowledge or code reading T-rustdoc Relevant to rustdoc team

Comments

@QuietMisdreavus
Copy link
Member

While reviewing rust-lang/rust#50302 i noticed that these test folders aren't mentioned in the testing chapter at all. Since the linked PR adds a special configuration flag to the rustdoc-js tests, it would be worth mentioning it in the testing guide.

@mark-i-m mark-i-m added E-help-wanted Call for participation: extra help is wanted E-medium Difficulty: might require some prior knowledge or code reading labels May 8, 2018
@jieyouxu jieyouxu added the T-rustdoc Relevant to rustdoc team label Nov 4, 2024
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Nov 4, 2024

Triage: rustdoc-js tests have now been documented by #2048. But AFAICT rustdoc-ui could still use some more elaboration.

@jieyouxu jieyouxu added C-enhancement Category: enhancement A-test-suite Area: rust-lang/rust test suites labels Nov 4, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-test-suite Area: rust-lang/rust test suites C-enhancement Category: enhancement E-help-wanted Call for participation: extra help is wanted E-medium Difficulty: might require some prior knowledge or code reading T-rustdoc Relevant to rustdoc team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants