-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 465
Consider pruning gen_ascii_chars #46
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
It has a default implementation so you’re free to ignore it even if you’re implementing your own random number generator. |
Sure, but it's a highly purpose-specific call, with a misleading name (it generates A-Za-z0-9, not any ASCII), on a very general type. |
I was about to file a new issue, but this will do. I saw If this is not removed, it should be renamed to |
I can do the above change if someone agrees. If we do agree, should we leave both functions for now (rea, and a proxy renamed method), where the older depracated one will print an annoying message to the user? Maybe relevant linky. |
With #279 |
It seems to only be used in tests of its functionality, and is a bit specific for a method on every RNG.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: