We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
See: rust-lang/rust#63791
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Similarly, should there be an advisory for:
Rust 1.45.0: Regression from 1.44 to 1.45 rust-lang/rust#74739
Rust 1.41.0: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2020/02/27/Rust-1.41.1.html
In theory, these could cause security vulnerabilities?
Sorry, something went wrong.
For some reason aes-soft never got never got an advisory - or it's not there atm RustCrypto/block-ciphers#51 (comment)
I started a wider discussion whether we should file advisories against Rustc - which we don't atm #1353
We need to see if it is feasible to file advisories against Rustc first - Closing until that is resolved.
No branches or pull requests
See: rust-lang/rust#63791
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: