You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 25, 2024. It is now read-only.
I want to know why the location loss function is divided by negative samples number(num_neg) but the all sample (num_neg + num_pos),I really know the location loss is producted by negative samples, but implement in the paper is the divided all sample (num_neg + num_pos).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
# for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
#.
I want to know why the location loss function is divided by negative samples number(num_neg) but the all sample (num_neg + num_pos),I really know the location loss is producted by negative samples, but implement in the paper is the divided all sample (num_neg + num_pos).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: