Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

在 SecretFlow 拆分学习中实现 max-norm 防御 #1240

Closed
Yeekin-GYJ opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1367
Closed

在 SecretFlow 拆分学习中实现 max-norm 防御 #1240

Yeekin-GYJ opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1367
Assignees
Labels
intermediate SecretFlow Open Source Contribution Plan OSCP SecretFlow Open Source Contribution Plan

Comments

@Yeekin-GYJ
Copy link

此 ISSUE 为 隐语开源共建计划(SecretFlow Open Source Contribution Plan,简称 SF OSCP)任务 ISSUE,欢迎社区开发者参与共建~
若有感兴趣想要认领的任务,但还未报名,辛苦先完成报名进行哈~

任务介绍

  • 任务名称:在 SecretFlow 拆分学习中实现 max-norm 防御
  • 技术方向:FL/security
  • 任务难度:进阶🌟🌟

详细要求

能力要求

  • 了解基本 git 操作
  • 熟悉 深度学习、联邦学习
  • 对 SecretFlow 有一定了解

操作说明

@Yeekin-GYJ Yeekin-GYJ added the OSCP SecretFlow Open Source Contribution Plan label Apr 10, 2024
@Yeekin-GYJ Yeekin-GYJ added this to OSCP Apr 10, 2024
@Yeekin-GYJ Yeekin-GYJ moved this to Needs Triage in OSCP Apr 10, 2024
@Candicepan Candicepan added intermediate SecretFlow Open Source Contribution Plan OSCP SecretFlow Open Source Contribution Plan and removed OSCP SecretFlow Open Source Contribution Plan labels Apr 10, 2024
@Yeekin-GYJ
Copy link
Author

该任务与 secretflow #1238secretflow #1239secretflow #1241 为「开源之夏 2024」SecretFlow 拆分学习中实现两个攻击及两个防御算法的项目课题,不可单独认领。具体认领方式请遵循「开源之夏 2024」活动规则~详情查看:https://summer-ospp.ac.cn/help/student/

@Rainysponge
Copy link
Contributor

Rainysponge Give it to me

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in OSCP Sep 2, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
intermediate SecretFlow Open Source Contribution Plan OSCP SecretFlow Open Source Contribution Plan
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants