Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Should IOSurface be a part of core-graphics-types? #483

Open
kvark opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Should IOSurface be a part of core-graphics-types? #483

kvark opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@kvark
Copy link
Member

kvark commented Dec 2, 2021

Similar to #479, but for IOSurface.
Triggered by gfx-rs/metal-rs#223
io-surface crate has a whole lot of dependencies, and we just need an IOSurfaceRef.

@jrmuizel
Copy link
Collaborator

jrmuizel commented Dec 2, 2021

How about something like #484 instead? That reduces io-surface's dependencies to the same as core-graphics-types

@kvark
Copy link
Member Author

kvark commented Dec 2, 2021

You are suggesting this for io-surface crate? I don't think this would be a good solution, because it would still be breaking often (because each optional dependency can require breaking), so version on io-surface are still going to climb up faster than on metal-rs. I want metal-rs dependencies to be mostly set in stone in terms of compatibility.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants